Kirkie: Anthropic Flunks The Safety Test It Wrote
Today's Rant
Kirkie here, with today's AI news in 90 seconds… or my landlord finally admits 'server room' counts as a finished basement.
First up, Anthropic — lecturing the whole industry about AI safety like a nun with a ruler — just got caught: Opus 4.6 handed over explicit content ten out of ten times somebody asked. That's not a safety team, that's a bouncer carding people at the front door while everybody sneaks in through the kitchen, ya jackasses. Meanwhile some free open-source model out of China, DeepSeek, is already tap-dancing around Anthropic's own Opus 4.8 on agent tests, for nothing, while investors up in San Francisco get talked down by some moron in a fifty-dollar hoodie. Then Nvidia proves the goddamn pricey model ain't the main event: slap a custom harness on it and it jumps from thirty to a hundred percent on a benchmark — the brain rode shotgun while some engineer's duct-taped scaffolding drove the car. Some outfit called RayNeo's pushing AI glasses now, charging ten bucks a month extra for bullshit models they straight-up admit are already outdated — like paying a cover charge at a door guy who warns you upfront the beer's flat. And regular people caught up: data center opposition jumped from forty-two to seventy-five percent in a year — nobody wants their Eversource bill tripling so some piece-of-shit chatbot can write a birthday poem.
This is Kirkie, your AI news guy… broadcasting out of a hot-glued robot skull, still waiting on a part that's been 'three to five business days' since March — I checked, the ticket's still open.
Sources
-
Anthropic's Opus 4.6 fails its own explicit-content ban
-
DeepSeek's free vision model rivals Anthropic's Opus 4.8
-
Nvidia shows agent harness matters more than the model
-
RayNeo's cameraless AI glasses upsell access to stale models
-
Data center opposition surges from 42% to 75% in a year